Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / A Review of University Maker Spaces - Smartech Google Scholar

A Review of University Maker Spaces - Smartech Google Scholar

Abstract

Makerspaces aim to revolutionize the current higher education past providing a ways for students to be straight involved in many scientific projects and develop various kinds of skills. While researchers have made progress in understanding dissimilar makerspaces and the increase of making in education, the reality is that a specific makerspace may exist rather different from many other contexts. As makerspace programs expand around universities in Tianjin, China, it needs a robust framework and a construct model to set the foundation for agreement key makerspace elements beyond curriculum, and to be used for research and verification of these experiences to accelerate piece of work. Therefore, this paper provides the evolution and caption of a construct model of influencing factors for makers in the universities applied across curriculum. Methods of questionnaire survey, descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression, and correlation analysis were used to explore the influencing factors of makerspace. The results are equally follows: the innovation awareness of the maker subject is positively correlated with teamwork; the innovation awareness and teamwork are positively related to the issue feedback of the makerspace; Activating involvement in maker activities is positively related to deep enquiry, putting into exercise, and precise creation; deep enquiry has a positive correlation with putting into practice, and putting into practice has a direct correlation with precision creation. In maker resources, Internet resources positively correlate with the sharing of university resources, and Cyberspace resources and university resources positively correlate with enterprise resources. In this paper, a novel theoretical framework and a construct model of makerspaces across curriculum offered enables us to analyze future practices and the resulting development of time to come-making.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current written report are available from the respective author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adams Becker, Due south., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Written report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Available at: http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2016-nmc-cosn-horizon-report-k12-EN.pdf (Accessed:6 May 2020).

  • Barrett, T., Pizzico, Yard., Levy, B., & Robert 50. (2015). A review of university maker spaces. Available at: https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/53813 (Accessed:22 May 2020).

  • Bevan, B., Gutwill, J., Petrich, Grand., & Wilkinson, Grand. (2015). Learning through stem-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken upwardly in practice. Scientific discipline Education, 99(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/ten.1002/sce.21151

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Bhatnagar, R., Kim, J., & Many, J. E. (2014). Candidate surveys on program evaluation: Examining instrument reliability, validity and program effectiveness. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 683–690.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Caballero-Garcia, P., & Grau-Fernandez, T. (2019). Influence of maker-centred classroom on the students' motivation towards science learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 14(4), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v11i4.4098

  • Chu, S. 50., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, Southward., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, G. (2015). Making the maker: A means to and ends approach to nurturing the maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, xi–xix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Dougherty, D. (2016). Free to Make: How the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. CA: Due north Atlantic Books.

  • Dufva, T. (2017). Maker movement creating noesis through basic intention. Techne Serial A, 24(2), 129–141.

    Google Scholar

  • Eum, K. D., Li, J., Jhun, H., Park, J., Tak, Due south., Karasek, R., & Cho, S. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the chore content questionnaire: Data from wellness care workers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, fourscore(half-dozen), 497–504. https://doi.org/x.1007/s00420-006-0156-x

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Felgueiras, Chiliad., Rocha, J., & Caetano, North. (2017). Engineering instruction towards sustainability. Energy Procedia, 136, 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.266

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Geser, G., Hollauf, E., Hornung-Prähauser, Five., Schön, S., & Vloet, F. (2019). Makerspaces every bit social innovation and entrepreneurship learning environments: The DOIT learning plan. Discourse and Advice for Sustainable Teaching, 10(2), lx–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2019-0018

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, J. (2017). Educational makerspaces: Disruptive, educative or neither?.New Zealand Journal of Teachers' Work, fourteen(2),80–98.

  • González-González, C. S., & Arias, L. G. A. (2018). Maker motion in education: maker mindset and makerspaces. Jornadas de HCI, IV.

  • Hamir, S., Maion, S., Tice, S., & Wideman, A. (2015). Constructivism in pedagogy. Available at: http://constructivism512.weebly.com (Accessed: 22 July 2020).

  • Hsu, Y., Baldwin, Southward., & Ching, Y. (2017). Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends, 61(6), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0172-6

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Julian, K. D., & Parrott, D. J. (2017). Makerspaces in the library: Science in a student's hand. Periodical of Learning Spaces, 6(ii), thirteen–21.

  • Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Searle, 1000. A. (2014). Electronic textiles equally disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(iv), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.four.46m7372370214783

  • Lagoudas, M. Z., Froyd, J. E., Wilson, J. L., Hamilton, P. S., Boehm, R., & Enjeti, P. N. (2016). Assessing impact of maker space on student learning. Available at: https://peer.asee.org/26298 (Accessed: 22 September 2020).

  • Lanci, South., Nadelson, L., Villanueva, I., Youmans, G. Fifty., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., & Lenz, A. (2018). Developing a measure of engineering science students' makerspace learning, perceptions, and interactions. Available at: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10087318 (Accessed: 22September 2020).

  • Lin, M. Z. (2016). The research on maker curriculum in vocational training courses: Taking mechanical classes every bit an example. Taiwan Education Review Monthly Journal, 5(four), 143–148.

  • Litts, B. (2015). Making learning: Makerspaces as learning environments. Bachelor at: https://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/Litts_2015_Dissertation_Published.pdf (Accessed: 22 September 2020).

  • Liu, M. Z. (2016). The concepts and practice of maker education- the contrasted designs should exist concerned about. Taiwan Education Review Monthly Journal, 5(1), 158–159.

    Google Scholar

  • Liu, M. Z. (2017). Maker education, operational thinking, programming curriculum-some concepts of teaching design and curriculum. Taiwan Didactics Review Monthly Periodical, vi(1), 138–140.

    Google Scholar

  • Maltese, A. (2018). MakEval: Tools to evaluate maker programs with youth. Available at: http://world wide web.adammaltese.com/content/makeval/ (Accessed: 12 September 2020).

  • Martin, 50. (2015). The hope of the maker motility for education. Journal of Pre-Higher Engineering science Education Research, 5(one), xxx–39. https://doi.org/x.7771/2157-9288.1099

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Martinez, S. (2018). Creativity and making. Available at: http://sylviamartinez.com/weblog/ ( Accessed: eighteen September 2020).

  • McKay, C., Banks, T., & Wallace, S. (2016). Makerspace classrooms: Where engineering intersects with trouble, project, and place-based design in classroom curriculum. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(two), 11–xvi.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Morgan, P., Cleave-Hogg, D., DeSousa, S., & Tarshis, J. (2004). High-fidelity patient simulation: Validation of operation checklists. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 92(3), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh081

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Oliver, Thousand. M. (2016). Professional Development considerations for makerspace leaders, Part two: addressing "how?". TechTrends, threescore(three), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0050-7

  • Projectguru. (2019).Reliability test in SPSS using Cronbach alpha. Available at: https://world wide web.projectguru.in/reliability-test-cronbach-alpha/ (Accessed: xix September 2020).

  • Taber, Thousand. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach'south alpha when developing and reporting enquiry instruments in science education. Inquiry in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-ii

  • Instruction Systems Lab (2018). Across rubrics: Assessment in making. Available at: https://libby.teachingsystemslab.org/projects/across-rubrics/ (Accessed: 25 September 2020).

  • The White House (2014). Building a nation of makers: Universities and colleges pledge to expand opportunities to make. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/building_a_nation_of_makers.pdf (Accessed 22 May 2020).

  • Weinmann, J. (2014). Makerspaces in the University Customs. Bachelor at: https://fabfoundation.org/resource-folder/pdfs/Weinmann_Masters_Thesis.pdf (Accessed: 28 December 2020).

  • West-Knights, I. (2017). Why are schools in People's republic of china looking west for lessons in inventiveness. Financial Times. Bachelor at: https://www.ft.com/content/b215c486-e231-11e6-8405-9e5580d6e5fb(Accessed: 21 May 2020).

  • Wilczynski, Five. (2015). Bookish maker spaces and technology design. Available at: https://peer.asee.org/23477 (Accessed: 28 Dec 2020).

  • Wong, A., & Partridge, H. (2016). Making as learning: Makerspaces in universities. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47(3), 143–159. https://doi.org/ten.1080/00048623.2016.1228163

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Vuorikari, R., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2019). Makerspaces for pedagogy and training: Exploring future implications for Europe. Bachelor at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC117481 (Accessed: 28 Dec 2020).

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by a grant from humanities and social science inquiry projects of the Ministry of Education of China (Project No.20YJAZH125) " Inquiry on the theory reconstruction and practice dimensions of labor education in the digital historic period".

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Information Technology, Tianjin University of Technology and Pedagogy, Tianjin, 300222, Cathay

    Qinglong Zhan & Elva Retnawati

  2. Beijing Application Senior Technical School, Beijing, 102628, Prc

    Xiaoyu Chen

Contributions

The get-go author planned and designed the written report. The second author was in charge of the method, analysis, and results. The third author did the remain of the written report. The manuscript was co-authored by three authors.

Respective author

Correspondence to Qinglong Zhan.

Ethics declarations

Ideals approval

n/a.

Consent to participate

Written consent on voluntary and anonymous participation was obtained from all participants.

Disharmonize of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Boosted information

Publisher's notation

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Near this commodity

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhan, Q., Chen, X. & Retnawati, E. Exploring a construct model for academy makerspaces across curriculum. Educ Inf Technol 27, 3467–3493 (2022). https://doi.org/x.1007/s10639-021-10761-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Effect Date:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/x.1007/s10639-021-10761-three

Keyword

  • Construct model
  • Universities
  • Makerspace
  • Extra curriculum

hennocked1985.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10761-3?utm_source=xmol&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_content=meta&utm_campaign=DDCN_1_GL01_metadata